Mon, 20 May , 2024 Home About Us Advertisement Contact Us
Breaking News

Supreme Court re-installs SGPC general House elected in 2011

logo_sgpc

New Delhi, The Supreme Court today upheld the amendment to the Sikh Gurdwara Act, 1925 by the Parliament thereby withdrawing voting rights to the Sehajdharis. The Court revived the general house elected in 2011.

The apex court dismissed a petition by the SGPC as irrelevant in the context of the amendment.

A bench comprising Chief Justice TS Thakur and Justice AM Khanwilkar said there was no point in hearing the case just for the sake of “academic interest”.

The SGPC had approached the apex court challenging the December 20, 2011 judgment by the Punjab and Haryana Court restoring Sehajdharis’ right to vote.

The high court had quashed the Centre’s October 8, 2003 notification disenfranchising the Sehajdharis. The HC had explained that the Centre could not take away the right, given under the Gurdwara Act 1925, through an official notification.

In the light of the HC judgment, the Centre got the 1925 Act amended in Parliament and notified the new law on May 5, 2016, denying Sehajdharis the right to vote.

Subsequently, the SGPC moved an application in the apex court, pleading for allowing its appeal against the HC verdict on the basis of the new law.

Arguing for the SGPC, senior counsel AK Ganguly and Satinder Gulati pleaded with the bench to restore the committee elected in the September 18, 2011, SGPC elections. The bench accepted the plea.

On March 30, 2013, the SC had asked the November 2010 executive committee headed by Avtar Singh Makkar to manage the gurdwaras and other SGPC institutions as the Sehajdharis had not been allowed to participate in the 2011 election of the new Board. SGPC elections are held every five years.

Appearing for Sehajdhari Sikhs Federation (SSF), senior counsel Sushil Jain sought liberty to challenge the validity of the amendment to the Gurdwara Act. The bench said SSF was free to do so without the court’s nod.

In view of the HC verdict and the SC’s September 2011 order, the Centre was reluctant to convene the first meeting of the 170-member SGPC Board and came to the SC seeking its clarification despite notifying the new Board on December 17, 2011.

The SGPC also approached the apex court, seeking a direction to the Centre to convene the first meeting of the new Board and thereby facilitate election of its office bearers – president, senior vice-president, junior vice-president, general secretary and 11 executive committee members.

Comments

comments