Fri, 10 May , 2024 Home About Us Advertisement Contact Us
Breaking News

Modi not allowing MLAs to work: Kejriwal

Arvind-KejriwalNew Delhi, Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal has defended himself by blaming Prime Minister Narendra Modi for withholding the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) government’s bill exempting 21 parliamentary secretaries from their disqualification as MLAs because of the illegality of holding two offices of profit at once.
Kejriwal said the Prime Minister follows the agenda of “not working, neither allowing anyone to work”.
“None of the MLAs took a single penny, vehicle or bungalow. Every MLA was working for free but Modiji says: Everyone stay at home, no one will work,” Kejriwal said in a tweet.
“I had deputed one MLA each for electricity, water, hospital and school… but Modiji says ‘neither I will work, nor allow anyone to’,” he added.
“One MLA was spending his own petrol to visit hospitals. What wrong was he doing? Modiji has made him sit in the house,” he said.
The Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) government’s bill to exempt 21 parliamentary secretaries from their disqualification as MLAs because of the illegality of holding two offices of profit at the same time, received a major setback as President Pranab Mukherjee withheld the bill.
An organisation called the Rashtriya Mukti Morcha had petitioned the Delhi High Court, contending that these 21 legislators enjoy the status and perks of ministers, including office space and official cars, which is a misuse of the taxpayer’s money.
The PIL alleges that these appointments are “unconstitutional, illegal and without jurisdiction” and should be cancelled, pointing that the Delhi Government can have a maximum of seven ministers.
It also contends that along with seven ministers in Kejriwal’s Cabinet, these 21 people with minister status exceed that limit.
The petition argues that the Chief Minister has “no power, jurisdiction or authority” to administer oath of office to the Parliamentary Secretaries.
A petition has alleged that 21 legislators occupied offices of profit in violation of the Constitution.

Comments

comments