Mon, 23 December , 2024 Home About Us Advertisement Contact Us
Breaking News

CJI disappointed over PM not mentioning judges’ appointment

THAKUR_2613066f

New Delhi, Asserting that he has reached the peak of his career and is not afraid to speak his mind, Chief Justice of India TS Thakur on Monday expressed his disappointment at Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Independence Day address, saying he was hoping that there would be a mention on appointment of judges in his speech.
The CJI, who hoisted the Tricolour at the Supreme Court lawn, urged the Prime Minister to take action for the sake of justice for people, who had great expectations from the nation’s legal system.
“I was hoping that there would be talks about justice, about the appointment of judges. These days, cases are piling up and so are people’s expectations, which are making things difficult. Which is why I have time and again made this request that attention be given to this matter as well,” he said.
Meanwhile, Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal said he admired the CJI’s concern for justice. “I really really admire the CJI’s courage, conviction and his concern for justice,” he said in a tweet.
The Supreme Court on Friday had slammed the Modi-led government accusing it of “sitting over” judges’ appointments.

The CJI had sought a reply from Attorney General Mukul Rohtagi over the delay in appointment of judges as recommended by the collegium.
Slamming the government over the delay, he had said, “Don’t force us to pass orders to remove logjam.”
The apex court asserted that time had come to take judicial note of appointments and transfers, which had not been made despite the collegiums’ clearance eight months ago.
Regarding the collegium, the apex court said the names of 75 high court judges had been cleared, but had not been approved.
“The vacancies in high courts have increased to 43 per cent when the pendency in high courts has reached to four million cases. If the government has any objection on the names, it should be sent back to the collegiums with relevant matter, but the process can’t be stalled,” the court observed.

Comments

comments