Driving Naari Programme launched in Chandigarh
Amritsar, The railways has decided not to hold a probe against the driver of the DMU that was involved in the Amritsar rail tragedy.
Meanwhile, plying of all trains from the Amritsar railway station has been withheld subject to security clearance from the state government.
Security has been beefed up in and around the railway station to avert any untoward situation arising out of the possible protests by people.
As per the train speedometer, the DMU was running at 91 kmph when the accident took place. During the accident the speedometer also got damaged.
Railway officials refused to reveal the identity of the driver, who said that after noticing the people he applied the brakes to bring down the speed but it was too late.
There is a manned railway crossing nearby called Jodda Phatak as twin railway lines–Amritsar to Jammu and Amritsar to Delhi–meet here leading to the Amritsar railway station.
People say the gateman could have alerted the authorities after seeing a large number of people gathered over the railway tracks.
On Saturday, as a precautionary measure, the gateman was removed from the level crossing and armed guards of the Railway Protection Force were guarding the railway installation there.
At the accident site, an irregular boundary wall was seen on both sides of the railway lines to separate railway tracks from the residential localities.
Meanwhile, Divisional Railway Manager Vivek Kumar refused to hold a probe into the accident and termed it a run-over on a largescale. He said the people standing on the railway tracks amounted to trespassing and that the railways had not got any case registered.
He said the driver was not at fault as the train was being driven on the major Amritsar-Delhi railway line, which is supposed to accommodate trains running at 110 kmph.
He said that the driver after noticing the people over the tracks applied the brakes and brought down the speed to 68 kmph but the damage was already done.
He ruled out any mistake of the gateman saying the accident site was about 400 metres ahead of the level crossing. He said the duty of the gateman was to manage the gate; besides, the accident site was not properly lit and was not clearly visible from the level crossing.
