Fri, 26 April , 2024 Home About Us Advertisement Contact Us
Breaking News

Smoking costs $1.4 tn in health care, labour loss

2017_1$largeimg31_Tuesday_2017_221139698

Paris

Smoking cost the world economy more than USD 1.4 trillion (1.3 trillion euros) in 2012, and sucked up a twentieth of health care spending, a study said on Tuesday.

The killer habit consumed the equivalent of nearly 2 per cent of global economic output or GDP, according to experts from the World Health Organization (WHO) and the American Cancer Society, with almost 40 per cent of the burden falling on developing countries.

These included a USD 422 billion price tag for treatment and hospitalisation, as well as indirect costs from labour lost to illness and death.

“Smoking imposes a heavy economic burden throughout the world, particularly in Europe and North America, where the tobacco epidemic is most advanced,” said the study published in the journal Tobacco Control.

“These findings highlight the urgent need for countries to implement stronger tobacco control measures to address these costs.”

The authors say the study is the first ever to include low- and middle-income countries in a more accurate estimate of the tobacco epidemic’s total, global cost.

Most previous work has focused on rich nations.

The team used data from 152 countries representing 97 per cent of the world’s smokers in Africa, the Americas, the Eastern Mediterranean, Europe, Southeast Asia and the Western Pacific.

They included UN and World Bank data on illness and death attributable to smoking, national employment rates and national GDP.

In 2012, they found, “diseases caused by smoking accounted for 12 per cent (2.1 million) of all deaths among working age adults aged 30-69 — with the highest proportion in Europe and the Americas”.

Almost 40 per cent of the global economic cost was borne by low- and middle-income countries — a quarter by Brazil, Russia, India and China alone.

China consumes over a third of the world’s cigarettes and has a sixth of the global smoking death toll.

The researchers said the real cost was likely much higher.

Comments

comments